Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 10 years ago
#813 new defect
Organising ex.dc* metadata
Reported by: | ak19 | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | moderate | Milestone: | Possible 2.88 Release |
Component: | GLI | Severity: | enhancement |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
From emails sent by Dr Nichols:
I think it is fine to keep ex.dc.* if:
- it is separated out and placed directly below the dc.* in the Enrich tab:
so the sets go dc, ex.dc, gs, ex
otherwise it is not visible, it is hidden in the rest of the ex stuff
- the default format statements include ex.dc as one of the fallbacks
- the lack of editability is explained in the UI somewhere:
- with tooltips (which could include something like "extracted
metadata from file 000metadata.csv, this value can't be changed in GLI, make changes in the the original file', or some better phrasing
- maybe with some other graphical marker in the left hand column,
just like the inherited/folder metadata icon. Again with useful tooltip text.
that is a simpler improvement.
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | → 2.86 Release |
---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Earlier suggestions by Dr Nichols follow.
(The distinction mentioned below may not be so concrete, I may have been wrong in assuming it. -- Anu)
GLI says ex.dc.* "belongs to the Greenstone metadata set". IF [a distinction between GS extracted <metadataset> metadata (e.g. ex.dc.*) and Greenstone ex.* meta] is important THEN:
1. GLI UI text should reflect it.
2. I suggest that such metadata should be listed between dc.* and the rest of the ex.*, at the moment it is just mixed in the middle of the ex.* (via an alphabetical sort); whereas it is more natural to think of it as somewhere in between these two groups of metadata.
Also, the tootltips for ex.dc.* are wrong, they aren't updated correctly. When you put your cursor over, say, ex.dc.Subject, the tooltip shown is something completely different.