Ticket #385 (closed annoyingness: fixed)

Opened 11 years ago

Last modified 9 years ago

archivedir vs assocfilepath

Reported by: kjdon Owned by: kjdon
Priority: low Milestone: 2.84 Release
Component: Collection Building Severity: minor
Keywords: Cc:

Description

The perl code uses both archivedir and assocfilepath. I think these are the same thing. Can we get rid of one of them??

Change History

Changed 10 years ago by kjdon

This was in an email from Michael:

I'm just committing a change to this file to use "archivedir" instead of "assocfilepath" when generating the path to the Lucene text files, because this still works properly when the archives directory gets a bit weird (e.g. if you import a collection in parts and want symbolic links in "archives" to the individual archives directories). I don't think there are any disadvantages to this, and hopefully it doesn't break anything...

Changed 9 years ago by kjdon

  • owner changed from nobody to kjdon
  • status changed from new to assigned
  • milestone set to 2.84 Release

Find out what the above message is from and make sure I haven't broken anything - in colservr c++ code??

then close the ticket.

Changed 9 years ago by kjdon

  • status changed from assigned to closed
  • resolution set to fixed

archivedir is still kept, used during building. but in file paths in metadata, only assocfilepath is used now.

I left lucenesource.cpp using archivedir instead of changing to assocfilepath.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.